Why is peer review important in research?

Office People Accused Accusing  - www_slon_pics / Pixabay

Research is defined as an exploration of facts derived from both the primary and secondary sources of information to ascertain whether the proposed hypothesis is correct or not. The work needs to be within the approved framework and presented in the form of a well-structured thesis. It is said that before taking the work to the mentor for evaluation, one should take peer review. Here we explain why it can be beneficial for your research.

  1. Validates the work: When you keep the peer in the loop while researching, you get the backing of trusted entities. Their experience, approach, and understanding of the subject allow them to give you the best validation. By getting the peer review done, you get the facts checked from one more set of eyes. It brings an added level of credibility to work. The peers are qualified or may have done work in a similar field in the past. That is why it helps the researcher has validated the correctness of the facts included in the research.

  2. Peers provide much-needed feedback: The researchers require to keep the highest work standards maintained. It becomes possible to achieve only when an experienced and knowledgeable person has scanned the work. The peers can also tell the loopholes and areas for improvement and may even provide some tips to improve fact presentation or thesis structuring. All these pointers can help researchers submit the best quality work to the evaluator.

  3. Allows having meaningful questions answered: When the peers review the research work, they can tell about the more relevant questions. Including more meaningful questions and suggested answers or information about resources to find answers can change the quality of research for the better. It can make the research more yielding in terms of creating value for the people for which research is done.

  4. Helps keep originality and credibility of work undiluted: Peer review makes it possible for the researchers to chuck out the portions that may look unoriginal to the reviewer. The peers having a similar field experience may tell about how to keep the originality unquestionable. The researchers may also bring out the best and the most relevant information derived from the approved research tools. It helps add to the credibility of the research work.

  5. Helps have an opinion about the work’s acceptability: Researchers cannot go empty slate to the reviewer to submit their research. This approach can cost them their years. Peer review helps ascertain if the work is acceptable by all means. The peers can suggest if the work is qualified enough to get the nod from the approver or not. By marking the glaring areas requiring improvement, the researchers can solve all glitches and then get it re-checked to ensure that the work has the highest chances of getting accepted.

Because of all these reasons, peer review has become an essential part of the research. Several universities like Glasgow and other elite ones emphasize peer reviews before the researcher sends the thesis work to the checking authorities.